TheStreet.com RealMoney.com IPOPros.com TheStreetPros.com Your Money/Shopping Help
Home  

Latest Stories  

Market Briefing  

Market News  

Stock News  

Tech Stocks  

Personal Finance  
Commentary  

International  

Tools/Quotes  

Investing Basics  

Message Boards  

Chats & Appearances  

TSC Audio/Video  

TSC Wireless  

Sports Scores  

Letters  

Corrections  

SEARCH THE SITE  
  
  

Personal Finance : Dear Dagen
Small Change: New ETFs Muddy Waters of Small-Cap Index Funds
By Dagen McDowell
Senior Writer

6/5/00 12:42 PM ET


Buying an index fund is supposed to be simple.

But with the recent explosion of exchange-traded funds, the once-staid world of index funds has gotten complicated. And when you get down to index funds for small-cap stocks, it can get downright murky.

A recent column discussed the new technology index funds that are hitting the market and their obvious and not-so-obvious differences. Today's column will examine small-cap index funds, and advise that, even in this new landscape, investors serve themselves well by keeping it simple.

Up until a few weeks ago, you couldn't find an exchange-traded small-cap index fund. They didn't exist. Then Barclays Global Investors came along and launched two: the iShares Russell 2000 (IWM:Amex - news) and the iShares S&P SmallCap 600 (IJR:Amex - news) funds. (Unlike traditional mutual funds, exchange-traded funds trade like stocks. You don't actually invest money in a portfolio but instead buy shares in the secondary market from other investors and market-makers.)

Within the next few months, you will see six more specific small-cap ETFs. Barclays will come out with iShares Russell 2000 Growth (IWO:Amex) and Value (IWN:Amex) funds and S&P SmallCap 600/BARRA Growth (IJT:Amex) and BARRA Value (IJS:Amex) funds.

Also, State Street will come out with two small-cap funds that cater to specific investing styles: the SSgA Dow Jones U.S. Small Cap Growth and the Dow Jones U.S. Small Cap Value funds.

These new offerings leave investors with a dizzying array of choices. With the offerings, you will not only have to choose between index providers. You'll also have to choose between styles. Trying to predict which style will outperform and when is practically impossible. Most investors should just stick with a broad small-cap fund and should not bother with trying to dissect the style-specific indices.

Small-Cap Smorgasbord
ETFs will offer a variety of ways to track small-cap indices.
Index Exchange-Traded Fund Number of Stocks 1-Year Performance 2-Year Performance
Russell 2000 iShares Russell 2000 (IWM:Amex - news) 2000 12.8% 8.4%
S&P SmallCap 600 iShares S&P SmallCap 600 (IJR:Amex - news) 600 15.4 7.1
Russell 2000 Growth iShares Russell 2000 Growth (IWO:Amex)* 1195 26.1 30.5
Russell 2000 Value iShares Russell 2000 Value (IWN:Amex)* 1165 -1.3 -12.7
S&P SmallCap 600/BARRA Growth iShares S&P SmallCap 600/BARRA Growth (IJT:Amex)* 196 26.1 20.7
S&P SmallCap 600/BARRA Value S&P SmallCap 600/BARRA Value (IJS:Amex)* 404 2.7 -7.8
Dow Jones U.S. Small Cap Growth SSgA Dow Jones U.S. Small Cap Growth* 484 55.6 77.4
Dow Jones U.S. Small Cap Value SSgA Dow Jones U.S. Small Cap Value* 377 -2.4 -15.3
Source: Baseline, Russell, Standard & Poor's, Dow Jones. Performance through June 1. * Expected to launch in June or July.

Like I said at the beginning: Keep it simple.

That means deciding between the Russell 2000 and the S&P SmallCap 600, two indices that are strikingly similar.

The two market-cap weighted indices behave very similarly to one another. (A market-cap weighted index allows the larger companies to carry a greater influence on performance.)

They are closely correlated when comparing their performance over the last 10 years. With a 1 meaning two securities move exactly together and a negative 1 meaning their move inversely, the Russell 2000 and the S&P SmallCap 600 have a correlation of 0.98, according to data provided by Charles Schwab's Center for Investment Research.

"There is some small difference, but for all intents and purposes, they are the exact same," says Bryan Olson, director of Schwab's research center.

The market capitalizations of listed companies are also close. The median market capitalization of the Russell 2000 is about $440 million. The S&P SmallCap index's median market cap is around $458 million.

Their sector allocations can also line up. At the end of March, the Russell has 29.4% allocated to software, computers, semiconductors and electronics. The S&P index had 27.3% dedicated to the same four groups. These two iShares funds also cost the same at 0.2% a year.

However, if you want a broader, more true small-cap index, you should go with the Russell.

The Russell, for one, is a broader benchmark, with 2000 stocks compared to the 600 names in the S&P SmallCap index.

With the Russell 2000, you will end up with a more pure small-cap index. Frank Russell's approach to selecting stocks for this index is quantitative, while Standard & Poor's is more qualitative. Russell looks only at market cap to determine which companies go into the index. (The company rebalances the index once a year at the end of June.)

S&P takes a more qualitative approach and runs its indices "by committee rather than by rule book," says David Blitzer, chairman of S&P's index committee. S&P will promote and demote companies as necessary, say when there's a merger or acquisition that makes a change essential.

Because of these irregular changes, you will find several stocks that should be in the S&P SmallCap index that are not. If you took 1,500 stocks represented in the S&P 500, the S&P MidCap 400 and the S&P SmallCap 600 and ranked them according to market cap, you'll find 20 stocks in the large-cap 500 that should be in the SmallCap index, says Diane Garnick, derivatives strategist at Merrill Lynch.

"They don't remove companies when they should," says Garnick.

Stocks such as Polaroid (PRD:NYSE - news) and Bethlehem Steel (BS:NYSE - news) are in the S&P 500 but should be in the S&P SmallCap based on their market-cap ranking, says Garnick. There's one stock in the SmallCap index -- testing-software manufacturer Mercury Interactive (MERQ:Nasdaq - news) -- that should be in the 500 based on its market cap.

The Russell 2000 is your choice.

If you start looking at the style-specific indices, the S&P indices do have one noticeable advantage. The division between growth and value is clear and easy to understand. The stocks are ranked by price-to-book value with the low value stocks going into the value index and the high value stocks going into the growth index.

Russell uses a second variable -- long-term forecasted earnings growth -- to differentiate between growth and value indices. Some companies are deemed to have both growth and value elements, so they show up in both indices.

The new Dow Jones indices use six factors to determine the style characteristics of the stocks in the universe, including projected and trailing price-to-earnings valuations.

The Russell and S&P small-cap style index funds will all have annual expenses of 0.25% when they launch. The State Street Dow Jones funds haven't been priced but you can expect their expenses to be competitive.

For many investors, the final decision will inevitably come down to cost.


Send your questions and comments to deardagen@thestreet.com, and please include your full name.


Dear Dagen aims to provide general fund information. Under no circumstances does the information in this column represent a recommendation to buy or sell funds or other securities.
Send letters to the editor to letters@thestreet.com.
Read our conflicts and disclosure policy.
Order reprints of TSC articles. Top

RELATED STORIES


Dear Dagen
How the 'Green Shoe' Can Give an IPO a Lift
6/1/00 11:55 AM ET
A discussion of why IPOs sometimes falter on day one isn't complete without a mention of this tactic.

Dear Dagen
Filings Could Have Raised Red Flags About Celebrity Adviser
5/31/00 12:26 PM ET
Dana Giacchetto's celebrity clients might have been more wary had they looked up his Form ADV.

Dear Dagen
What If a Company Goes Public and No One Buys?
5/30/00 12:44 PM ET
It can happen when the issuer and the underwriter miscalculate demand for the new shares.





Sponsored Links

















Home | Top

 


 © 2000 TheStreet.com, Inc. All rights reserved.
  Enter symbol or name:
   

Browse
The Archive
Markets

Stock News

Personal Finance

401(K)S

TSC OPTIONS FORUM

TSC PORTFOLIO PLANNERS

TSC TAX FORUM

ANDREW MORSE

CHRISTOPHER EDMONDS

DAVID KURAPKA

DEAR DAGEN

EDITOR'S LETTER

FIXED-INCOME FORUM

FUND FACEOFF

GAME PLAN

GARY B. SMITH

HERB GREENBERG

INSURANCE

INVESTING

JEFF BRONCHICK

JIM SEYMOUR

MOMENTUM TRADING

MONEMAILBAG

MUTUAL FUNDS

PORTFOLIO MANAGER'S TOOLBOX

SMARTER MONEY

STOCK STRATEGIES

TAXES

THE BUZZ BEAT

THE DAILY QUESTION

TOOLS OF THE TRADE

UNDER THE HOOD

Commentary

Investing Basics

International

Tech Stocks

Community

Community